Phytoremediation and Bioremediation referred to in an earlier blog are not the best words to start anything you want others to read. But bear with me as the title to the blog is closer to the mark. For many years now the rest of the world has been progressing dramatically in the science of using plants and trees to treat contaminated and polluted sites. I hate to say this but the UK lags behind significantly and whilst the technology is accepted and used in the UK, it is still in it's infancy.NASA recently spend considerable resources into the research of houseplants and just how much they can do in purifying air. The results are staggering, with many of the palm species coming out on top with incredible rates of absorbation for pollutants including: Formaldehyde, Carbon Monoxide, xylene, and benzene. As such stick a Dracaena marginata in every room.The most incredible results have come out of the research into trees and plants when grown on known contaminated sites. Unfortunately it is impossible to link to the pages detailing the comprehensive lists of the species which can actually reduce and degrade pollutants such as Oils and other hydrocarbons, Heavy metals such as arsenic, lead and cadmium, nitrate and other leachates. But I want to list a few species of particular note:Grasses: 2 of our more common species; Lolium perenne ,Ryegrass and Festuca rubra Red Fescue, have both been proven to enhance degradation of hydrocarbons in soil.Trees: Willow species are well known for their ability to uptake leachates at an incredible rate, but they are capable of degrading some of the more unpleasant heavy metals as well, including cadmium. Holly can also 'accumulate' cadmium.Mulberries, (which I personally feel everyone should plant if they can), have phenolic compounds in the roots which assist degrading bacteria to an amazing degree, breaking down many nasty pollutants in the soil.[A wee diversion, but on the same lines as the degrading bacteria, it is possible to buy enzymes, which will effectively eat oil, diesel and petrol spills. I tested this out once after an incident with a DERV Landrover, stupidly pouring it onto tarmac, the enzymes had a field day and to the best of my knowledge are continuing to munch their way along the road in question - check out zebec]Poplars should be grown more in the UK, particularly as due to increased levels of nutrients flowing into our watercourses have caused stupidly high levels of nitrogen, the rate of uptake by a poplar is staggering. Alders will of course do the same.Other key species are: Birch, for degrading pollutants in dry sites, Red Maples, (together with Alders), are fantastic to capture leachates around landfill sites no matter how large, Buffalo Grass and Miscanthus also.We are in the process at the moment of waiting to get clearance from the quangos to accept biomass from trees and plants used for phytoremediation purposes available for waste to energy. Shouldn't be a problem and watch this space. But if there is a green light - imagine being able to remediate pollution and get paid every seven years for the by product.www.paysagedurable.com
Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Comments

  • PRO
    Great post Pip

    You might be interested in sunflowers and how they were used to clean up the contamination after the Chernobyl disaster.
  • PRO
    "Sunflowers were grown using hydroponics to create long root systems. The plants were then transferred to huge floating rafts where the long roots would be dangled into the polluted water. There is evidence that using this method, the Sunflower can extract massive quantities of toxins, including metals such as uranium from deep into the water.

    It is believed this method accounted for removing 95% of radiation from polluted water after Chernobyl."
  • In my capacity as an environmental scientist I have carried out a number of desktop land contamination studies. Where land contamination has the potential to be present I have had to put to the local planning authority a remediation proposal. The whole land contamination situation in the uk is in flux as DEFRA (in their infinite wisdom) have replaced the old contamination assessment system with a Soil Guidance Value system. However there are not many SGV's in place at present. The reality is Local Authorities use a wide mix of contamination assessment methods, but err on the side of caution.
    Anyway to the real point, I have informally put forward the phytoremediation/bioremediation approach on a number of occasions, the argument falls on deaf ears. The law regarding contamination responsibility, and the lack of skilled planning officers (prepared to think independantely) means that any potential for human contact with contaminants means remove the source.
    A recent re-development of a residential plot I dealt with was flagged up as contaminated, the levels were not high or extensive and a few such as nickel were purely phytotoxic (no human threat) in this case only 0.9mg/kg over threshold limit. The Planning Section insisted on the removal of the contaminated topsoil to a hazardous waste landfill. So 38 tonnes of marginally contaminated topsoil to be removed to landfill and replaced by clean tested topsoil - How sustainable is this approach.
    If anybody could provide me with any referenced scientific research info on bio/phyto-remediation they have come across I will look into it and see if I can use it to break the source-pathway-receptor link enough to satisfy planning considerations.
This reply was deleted.

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Open forum activity

Billybop replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Hi yes I still have my 6500 Ego too, kept in case the newer one ever failed, but it hasn't. Had the 5 hundred-something cfm one before that, now flogged to a mate who loves it. The LB8800 is hovering around the £300 mark on amazon including import…"
yesterday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Just change to a backpack, br800 7yrs and not even a sparkplug yet"
yesterday
Clive replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Stop using BG86s absolutely years ago first ego blower I had which is now my spare is the 6500 now have the 7650 which is brilliant. 
for large areas I have a back pack Stihl BR800 this combo does me "
yesterday
Adam Woods replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"I use a BGA50 - with 3 batteries rotating... each lasts around an hour - there is an AP version which probably has much better batteries. Then for heavy duty work a BR500. We bought that last year, and at the time looked at the BRA500 - but  with…"
yesterday
John F replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"When you say lately Tim have you considered fuel contamination ? 
Generally have always used the Stihl kombi with the ( blower attachment ) as a dedicated blower .
It does play up so i take it to my repair guy who always manages to keep it going on…"
yesterday
Honey Badger replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"I've watched a few videos on the 9010 serious power knocks the socks of the br850.  I'm not a fan of 4mix engines.
20yrs with a blower that's Impressive.
I haven't managed to find a local dealer for echo I'd prefer to have a look first than buy…"
Friday
Peter sellers replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"We have run pb 8010's for four years without issue and also pb770"s for everyday use. The pb 9010 is 10% more powerful than the 8010 which in itself is an awesome blower and outperforms anything Stihl have. We are nearly all Echo kit now and have…"
Friday
Honey Badger replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"I use the husqvarna 525bx. I used to use bg86's (had 3), carbs were good for 3-4 years before failure. You can get cheap Chinese carbs. 525bx is a better machine, it doesn't turn in the hand because of the nozzle and is more powerful, I think its…"
Thursday
Billybop replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Ego 7650 battery model has excellent power had it a few years now and has never missed a beat, I use the 7.5ah batteries with it, they have recently brought out a couple slightly more powerful but those have a fancy LED screen which would get…"
Thursday
Peter sellers replied to Tim Bucknall's discussion Stihl blowers failing
"Echo are bombproof !!"
Thursday
Tim Bucknall posted a discussion
I've had a definite increase in machinery failing, and lately I've had a rash of BG86 blowers failing due to carburettor wear- something I've never come across before.  Has anyone else had issues like this?  What hand-held blowers would people…
Thursday
Sam Bainbridge replied to Peter sellers's discussion Making tax digital
"Let's face it this first year they will stamp there feet if you don't comply but won't do anything, next year will be the year"
Wednesday
Sam Wharton updated their profile photo
Tuesday
Ian Harvey replied to Peter sellers's discussion Making tax digital
"I suggest that everybody on here read the HMRC MTD Guidance notes.
HMRC base the requirement for MTD ITSA on prior year tax return figures, including any now-ceased income streams. No crystal balls involved."
Tuesday
Peter sellers replied to Peter sellers's discussion Making tax digital
"Good point about having a crystal ball re turnover. Like you say what can they do about it!"
Dec 8
Sam Bainbridge replied to Peter sellers's discussion Making tax digital
"Oh right i run as a partnership to help the tax that's what he would be meaning 
There's your first loop, you didnt know you have income of over 50k until you did your tax return at the end of year they'll grumble but won't do anything about it.…"
Dec 8
More…

Making tax digital

Thought there might be some unaware of this. So briefly and I am not an accountant . As from 6th April 26 anyone who has income from self employment, rent from property etc or a combination that equates to a turnover of 50k or more (not profit) will…

Read more…
26 Replies · Reply by Sam Bainbridge on Wednesday
Views: 842