About the Landscape Juice Network

Founded in 2008. The Landscape Juice Network (LJN) is the largest and fastest growing professional landscaping and horticultural association in the United Kingdom.

LJN's professional business forum is unrivalled and open to anyone within within the UK landscape industry

LJN's Business Objectives Group (BOG) is for any Pro serious about building their business.

For the researching visitor there's a wealth of landscaping ideas, garden design ideas, lawn advice tips and advice about garden maintenance.

Time to move from hand drawn to computerised plans!

Hi All,
Just found this website today by chance when trawling the internet for advice about garden design / Autocad. It looks like a great resource and I am thankful to have found it. My topic seems to have been raised here a few times before from what I can see but after reading a lot of different posts I am still confused.

Currently I am solely a garden designer. I previously did build also but with too much design work I could not balance both. My current process is;
1. Visit & site survey
2. Hand draw survey and pencil overlays on A1 tracing paper for the second meeting
3. Back to the drawing board, make any necessary alterations as I ink up the proposals with my rotring drawing pens.
4. Meet the client with the finished proposals and hope that further alterations are not required. If they are I have to use a scalpol and scrape away part the drawing and the text and redraw.

Occasionally depending on my assessment of the client and their ability to understand plans I will skip the middle meeting and risk finishing the plan and hope that changes are not required. I use the aid of photos to help clients visualse the different elements in the proposals and quick sketch elevations which I don't mind doing but can sometimes be time consuming to get angles etc right.

When moving files etc recently to new storage I noticed I would have in excess of 500 hand-drawn time consuming plans (bare with me I will try and speed this up!) - a too much time and too much effort.

Now that I solely design I am finding the draw-up / presentation stage very time consuming. Sometimes after drawing up the survey I spend a couple of hours doing the overlay proposals and I know I have got it right. Its the following time consuming process of drawing this up and hand labeling which is starting to get to me and the hoping that the client will not want changes. Basically something needs to change...
I think the use of a computer is enevitable. I always knew it would have to happen someday and I have put it off for a long as possible. I can see the benifits, easy alterations, plan storage, no last minute rush to the printers (over 1 hour from my house) before closing time, alterations easily sent to a client via email saving meeting and travel time as well as fuel. I am now convinced and ready to change.

I made an attempt earlier this year, I have access to Autocad 2005 and I had a one day one to one course with a hih profile garden designer who uses autocad. Intentions fell by the way-side as I was too busy to stop and learn how to use it.

There seems to be alot of chat about 'Sketchup and layout' approx £300 for the Pro version which I would be happy to invest in if I knew it was enough to change my process of working. I always think I will ned to have some hand drawn input. The way I would see this working is as follows:

1. Hand draw the survey and rough sketch proposals (3-5 hours)
2. Draw the survey on Sketchup 'Layout' or Autocad?
3. Overlay the design transferred from my rough sketches by my inputing on computer
4. Label the plan on sketchup 'Layout'
5. Pull up elevations on sketchup 3D (I have a notion of using my drawing pens to trace over adding a personal touch and scanning them and pull them back into the plan as an image - doable? Its just I think some of the Sketchup elevations look like dodgy graphics from 80s computer games)

Now the 2D and so 3D plan will be easy to alter / email / print hopefully? Any advice

You need to be a member of Landscape Juice Network to add comments!

Join Landscape Juice Network

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Hi Ryan

    If you're just getting into using computers as a drafting tool Sketchup is a good starting point, particularly if you have the full version with the layout tool which allows you to display elevations, scales and apply title blocks. I suppose the limitation is when producing construction details or quantifying the materials or plants on a plan.

    We use a combination of Autocad, Adobe Illustrator and Sketchup on our plans. We're also looking at an Autocad plugin which counts plants and materials quantities vs Vectorworks Landmark, with the view of committing either way next month. I'm sick of counting plants on my drawings.

    One bit of advice I'd suggest is to get a topographical survey done of any complex sites and import it either into Sketchup or Autocad (or equiv.), so you have a true scale base plan to work from. We bought our own total station for just this purpose.

    I've attached a couple of drawings to show what we get up to on that front. I've attached a plan of a summerhouse we designed with Sketchup a few years ago vs the as-built to show that it can be a useful representation, showing scale and proportion as well as indicative finishes. (rather than a photographic image).

    Best of luck.

    Forgot to mention that there is a free Autocad compatible program which might be worth a try: http://www.3ds.com/products-services/draftsight/download-draftsight/

    Scott

  • I use Vectorworks and would not be without it. But each to his own. My projects are all relatively small urban gardens. I can do the survey myself and then draw up in Vectorworks. Brilliant. I have also done a few projects where Architects have done an extension and since they also work in Vectorworks, we can share drawings and sometimes work in tandem.
    From the survey layer I can do the design, and once that is approved, then the planting layer. I love the flexibility of being able to switch on and off as many layers or classes as you want to create to make the document practical for your own use - and to present to client. No more hand labelling!! It is great to have everything one document that can be amended really easily (no tedious scratching out).
    Although I could do A1 or larger format on Vectorworks,because most of my projects are are fairly small urban gardens, even at 1:50, I can print them out from home on an affordable A3 printer so rarely have to make the journey to a print shop (even if I tape a couple of sheets together occasionally). But if I need to, I can email them the file to print out and pick it up when it suits (or they can deliver).
    I have not tried other CAD programmes TBH, but I am not sure they cater for planting plans as well as Vectorworks Landmark. I did try Sketch Up a couple of years ago but did not like it personally - Vectorworks is so much more precise and more easy to amend things in the design stage. You can still spend way too much time on computer designs as opposed to hand drawn (especially if you get into 3D) so it does not become cost effective against what you can charge the client. Personally I do not like the impersonal look of Sketch up (and similar) 3D garden designs, although I acknowledge it is a very useful bit of kit, easy to use and affordable. Also if everything is so super-realistic and looks so amazing graphically, the clients' expectations could be so elevated I wonder if clients might actually disappointed with the finished garden.
    As a sole practitioner, I have to use my time effectively and make my designs affordable for the clients. So, given that the majority of my gardens are fairly small scale, and that the majority of my clients have relatively low budgets (but often with high aspirations), I rarely do 3D work unless clients expressly ask for it and want to pay for it ;). I could do the 3D on Vectorworks in the same file and could add renders and textures etc if needed. But what I find is that for my clients and their budgets, all I need at the moment is a well presented and accurate design (scaled and annotated 2D plan) that landscapers can accurately quote (and build) from, along with some hand rendering and other visuals that help clients visualise what the garden will look like. Simplifying things in this way means that I can make the design more cost-effective and affordable so that clients can use more of their budget on the build. But I recognise that If I were working on larger scale rural or big budget projects this may not be quite so simple... Also if I were a larger company and could afford to employ a CAD monkey things may be different!
    Vectorworks is an investment, but it has definitely been worth it for me for where I am at now.
    All best

  • I always used to produce hand drawn plans but since starting to use Sketchup about 18 months ago I find that, especially as a presentation tool for clients, there is no comparison. I would advise that you try the free download of Sketchup and input some of your existing work into it as a practice exercise. I find that if you produce a line plan first (save this) then colour it in (save this) and then use the coloured version to produce a 3D visual. This keeps things organised and enables a staged approach until you are more confident. Note that I still produce hand drawn plans for landscaper use. Sketchup styles also give you 'pretty' options too if the customer requires this. If you want to look at some of my work then there is a collection within Landscape Juice, or just search Mike Bradley in the Sketchup 3D warehouse. Hope this helps.

  • PRO Supplier

    Interested to know if there is a time saving benefit to using Sketchup over hand drawn plans or if the real benefit is the easier process for undertaking amendments / saving the files / getting updates to the clients.

    Thanks,

    George

  • Great advice thanks. I am still in the in-between camp. Being a new sole-practitioner I am still hand-drawing for most clients. I do have Google sketch-up pro, however, have never used the drawings to present to clients as yet. At this stage, I still prefer the look of a hand-drawn Master plan to a Google sketch-up one. I know it will have to move away from hand-drawn at some point as I get busier so it's great hear recommendations on the options available.

    Thanks

  • Hi Guys,

    Firstly I want to say a big thank you for the replies. I think I love this website. I realise your replies take more than a couple of minutes to write and I really appreciate your time, hopefully I can help you guys out sometime.

    I am (hopefully) attaching three samples of my hand-drawn landscape proposals with sketch elevations to give you guys an idea of what I do. I think the elevations speak a thousand words and instantly give the customer a feel and sense of what you are proposing as I find certain people do not have a map-reading brain whereas others can ''get' a plan instantly. I have to say I am not a particular fan of alot of the 3-D colour rendered sketchup designs I have seen. I don't mean to dis anybody's work and please do not take insult, its just I think a line sketch looks more personal and soft and not too 'computer package' looking. That said I did see some very good examples but I imagine these can be time consuming as well. I like the idea of using the sketch up for a basic 3-D elevation to print out and overlay a quick 5-minute ink sketch which I can rescan as a pdf and pull back onto a computer plan (can I do this)?

    There are a few other options thorwn into the mix now such as Dynascape and Vectorworks which I have never heard of before but seem to be more lanscape orientated. I still have to get an understanding, and hopefully you caan help me, of how these things work. For example a lot of people have mentioned sketchup and once you have an elevation done you can then use layout (I may have got this wrong) to show cross sections and the scaled 2-d layout. This then tells me that you have to have a layout in your head and then design it in 3D first. (I must have this wrong as I don't think anyone could work this way). I would definately need to drawn up a 2-d survey to scale and start to scribble lines over it and then transfer onto a computer package of some sort. Am I correct in saying that you don't get sketchup free anymore? I downloaded something and it allowed me an 8-hour free trial.

    The next important thing is that the package would be compatable the other packages. Lets say an architect send me a Autocad plan of a new build and the site boundaries. Can I use this information in vectorworks, sketchup layout etc?

    People seem to mention that vectorworks is more expensive but Jenny you seem to be a big fan. How much would the likes of this package cost me? I had a quick look at their site and a presentation video but wasn't blown away. I like your enthusiam for it though and you seem to be in a similar situation to me.

    In the short term to get me started is their something available which would aloow me to label my own hand drawn plan and pull in sketches and title boxes etc. Usually the printing company scans my plans as a pdf so I would have to do the A1 drawing get it to the printers and then get it scanned then open it up and label it and resend it for printing.

    Considering I have access to CAD to I just take a week off for intense learning or maybe an hour each evening? Is autocad compatable with vectorworks or is vectorworks more simple at this early design stage. John, I also like the look of Dynascape, I assume it has the same process as CAD or vectorworks, the name sounds softer which I think my be giving me a false sense that it will be simple to use.

    I don't know if any of what I have typed above has made sense as my head is fried. I think I have to choose either Autocad (I have 2005), vectorworks (cost?) or Dynascape (cost) to create my 2-D plan and then pull this into sketchup if I want to create elevations for presentation purposes.

    Taking it a step further to create planting plans I have to get a plugin if I go Autocad route whereas Vectorworks and Dynascape is already adapted to create planting plans.

    Thanks for your patience guys, hopefully you give me a further bit of advice please..

    Many Thanks

    Ryan

  • Hi,

    We mainly undertake tree surveys, sometimes with very largeplots, we work with architecs so we 'have to' use autoCAD.
    We get around this by using 'Keyscape' LT Design pro .as a CAD engine this can then convert into numerous CAD year file types.
    Keyscapes is slightly cheaper than artisan, vectorworks. But for us it also as the add on of keytree which we use but we also use arborcad for tree plotting.
    The keyscapes, and i presuem vectorworks, once scald, works out the planting qty's and if you alter the bed sizes automatically alters the plant schedule - brilliant!
    I have had years and years of counting and manually changing schedules.
    It is cheap but it also a great time saver.

  • Sorry, typo's it isn't cheap, but it is cheape than full blown autoCAD !

  • Hi Susan,

    Thanks for your advice. Much appreciated

  • Hi Guys,

    I have not made the move to computers yet as this last few months has just been crazy. I came across a system or company through an architect last week which interests called 'Trial Systems'.  Will now try to add a link, this will be the tell of my computer skills..

    Trial Systems - Landscape Express

    I think that worked!!  Have any of you guys heard of or have any experience of this system or company?  

    Hopefully you can help.  Thanks in advance

    Ryan

This reply was deleted.

Trade green waste centres

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-WQ68WVXQ8K"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-WQ68WVXQ8K'); </script>

LJN Sponsor

Advertising