Founded in 2008. The Landscape Juice Network (LJN) is the largest and fastest growing professional landscaping and horticultural association in the United Kingdom.
LJN's professional business forum is unrivalled and open to anyone within within the UK landscape industry
LJN's Business Objectives Group (BOG) is for any Pro serious about building their business.
For the researching visitor there's a wealth of landscaping ideas, garden design ideas, lawn advice tips and advice about garden maintenance.
Replies
You have my full support and that of my business.
There will be a lot of discussions, exchanges of views and posts on this I am sure....
Some will support it, some will not.
However it is the way forward.
Regards, Gary
affinity landscapes
Regards Andy Cole
Lifestyle Landscapes
I urge everyone to have a view and I will make a promise that if this turns out to be a bad idea and it doesn't get majority support, LJN will continue as it has been doing under my terms.
Philip Voice said:
LJ is strong now and getting stronger by the day it's my opinion that associations are a dying breed, a boys club where only the strongest have a voice, and the little people are feeding them to keep them from dying.
I think landscape juice as it is, is the way forward.
martin said:
Basically I'd be happy to subscribe if it were proven that there is a reasonable chance of increased business and or training opportunity for my staff.
I guess what I would not want to see is a new organisation run by a few to the detriment of many. The current forum seems to me to work well, why fix what isn't broken?
I think it's a great idea in theory.
I personally do not wish to join the A.P.L. and the S.G.D. as I am not impressed by their member numbers, the standard of a lot of their members work I have witnessed via. websites etc. and the 'old boy's club' mentality they seem to have.
However, what does impress me is their ability to get their name mentioned in every newspaper article under the sun, their trade show presence and the 'block' adverts in the Yellow Pages directories for their members. If LJN was to form an association, I think it would also need such an 'off line' presence to make it work.
I don't think the membership fee should be based on turnover, but should be kept relatively low so that most members that want to join can afford to.
Several, well-known members of the garden design/academic fraternity have joined the network recently and I guess might be willing to be ambassadors for the new association.
Being honest, I really don't like the name 'Landscape Juice', I can see why you called your original blog this name and this forum network but I really think the proposed association needs a different brand to reflect it's potential global and predominately on-line membership. i.e. I don't think it should be called the British Association Of..... etc., more like 'The Open Association Of Landscape And Garden Specialists' if you get my drift.
Websitewise, you could set up another NING Network with private and publicly viewable pages (I suppose) so that each member gets their own profile page etc. Also, I think that members should be trusted to 'vet' their own skills and competences and there could even be a 'master list' of skills that could be used across the board for this purpose.
Checklistwise, I don't think the subjects of whether a member is a LTD company, VAT registered etc. should ever come into the equation and membership approval should be based solely on member's websites, photos, experience, qualifications, testimonials and peer-to-peer recommendations etc.
I think that the new association should try to reach out to as many land-based companies as possible as there are literally thousands of potential members out there, but at the same time there must be some kind of 'vetting' system to keep out the 'cowboys', 'rouge traders' and 'chancers'.
Jesus, that was a bit of a rant, but I suspect/expect there are longer ones to come from other forum participants in the not so distant future!
One reason to join the existing trade associations is that it could give you a professional advantage, due to the vetting process. What professional advantage would be had from joining a new organisation which doesn't vet its members?
Do we need an association? What would make us different and effective?
With regards to fee's - It should be a set amount regardless of size of turnover or status of the company however a reduced fee for students and the unwaged would be deemed acceptable.
I for one is currently sitting on the fence on this one - whilst I can see some benefit to forming an association it would ready be down to the aims and objectives and seeing a decent roadmap for the future.